Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Evan Furness vs Chun Hsin Tseng Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Furness vs Tseng analysis and find out who is favored!
Evan Furness vs Chun Hsin Tseng Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Furness 1 - 0 Tseng
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Furness has won 44.13% of points on their second serve, while Tseng has won 51.23%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Furness, in recent form, has won 51.99% of their opponent's second serve points, while Tseng has won 52.75%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.43% and 32.23% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Furness has saved 54.15% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tseng has saved 63.29% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Furness has won 44.44% of matches played (W/L 12/ 15), with Tseng winning 61.29% (W/L 38/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Furness has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 72% (W/L 84/ 32), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Tseng has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 107/ 64), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Furness has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 42.86% of matches (W/L 6/ 8), where as Tseng has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 61.82% of matches (W/L 34/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Furness winning 1 times and Tseng being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Furness winning 2 and Tseng winning 0. The last match between Furness and Tseng was at the Ostrava Challenger, 28-04-2022, Second, Clay with Evan Furness getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:9:59.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Furness and Tseng have played a deciding set 0 times, with Furness winning 0 times and Tseng 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Furness winning 0, and Tseng 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Furness has played against opponents with an average rank of 215.78 while Tseng has played against players with an average rank of 350.82.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Furness has won 29% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tseng has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Furness has converted 47.87% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tseng has converted 45% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
884
Rank
197
High
25
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
173
Rank
83
High
22
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
Form
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
59% (288-204)
Career Total W/L
60% (219-146)
44% (12-15)
YTD W/L
65% (26-14)
$5,730
Career Prize Money
$180,215
0
YTD Titles
2
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Evan Furness | Chun Hsin Tseng |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 2 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:9:59 | 1:9:59 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (25/42) | 57% (32/56) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 88% (22/25) | 56% (18/32) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 53% (9/17) | 33% (8/24) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 36% (5/14) | 0% (0/2) |
| Return Points W% | 54% (30/56) | 26% (11/42) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-1 |
Stats 
Evan Furness
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Evan Furness | Chun Hsin Tseng |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 44% (12/15) | 65% (26/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 47% (28/31) | 59% (54/37) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (271/289) | 53% (452/404) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 46% (6/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 38% (6/10) | 77% (20/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.21 | 0.26 |
| Aces Total | 56 | 110 |
| DFs per game | 0.37 | 0.25 |
| DFs Total | 100 | 106 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:34:34 | 1:48:48 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 215.78 | 339.6 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (1066/1798) | 54% (1515/2817) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (678/1066) | 70% (1057/1515) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (323/732) | 51% (667/1302) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (90/188) | 45% (126/280) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (728/1709) | 41% (1110/2726) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 46% (6/7) | 67% (26/13) |
| Futures W/L | 43% (6/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 44% (11/25) | 64% (25/39) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 29% (2/7) | 55% (6/11) |
| Deciding Set W% | 29% (2/7) | 75% (9/12) |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (14/12) | 100% (21/21) |
| 1st set W, L | 14% (14/2) | 0% (21/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (13/0) | 26% (19/5) |
Evan Furness Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Reymond
Player
Evan Furness
42%
(
38 of
90)
1st Serve %
66%
(
54 of
82)
4
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
37%
(
19 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
39 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
41 of
82)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Evan Furness
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
78)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
9
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
78)
80
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-7(3) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Alexis Gautier
52%
(
42 of
81)
1st Serve %
51%
(
31 of
61)
4
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
9
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
34 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
79
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Max Hans Rehberg
Player
Evan Furness
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
43%
(
31 of
72)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eero Vasa
Player
Evan Furness
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Edas Butvilas
Player
Evan Furness
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Johan Nikles
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucas Gerch
Player
Evan Furness
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefano Napolitano
Player
Evan Furness
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Chun Hsin Tseng Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
46%
(
42 of
92)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
44 of
92)
90
Total Points Won
73
|
6-2 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Laslo Djere
43%
(
28 of
65)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
29 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Michael Vrbensky
54%
(
43 of
79)
1st Serve %
45%
(
25 of
56)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Vit Kopriva
42%
(
24 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Toby Alex Kodat
55%
(
21 of
38)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
88%
(
15 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Marco Trungelliti
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
63%
(
29 of
46)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Francesco Passaro
57%
(
41 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
72%
(
43 of
60)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
75
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
47%
(
30 of
64)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Denis Yevseyev
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
53 of
87)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
87)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Furness Vs Tseng Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Furness are available here and Tseng photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Evan Furness
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Chun Hsin Tseng
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
